Majk ·
Step 1 of 11
💬
The conversation will appear here as you step through →
Y
You

I'm the provost at a mid-size university. I have this month's meeting transcripts from 6 departments: Admissions, Finance, Student Services, Academic Affairs, Advancement, and Facilities. Each team is executing their own plans and making their own decisions.

I need you to read across all 6 transcripts and find two things:

1. Conflicts — where has one department made a decision or commitment that contradicts what another department is doing? Where are timelines, resources, or plans going to collide?

2. Alignments — where are departments working on the same problem or moving in the same direction without knowing it? Where could we coordinate instead of duplicate?

For each conflict: who's affected and what needs to be resolved first. For each alignment: what's the opportunity if we connect these efforts. Build a single-page HTML dashboard to help me understand your analysis.

11:15 AM
A
AI Assistant Majk Rabbit

Reading all six transcripts now. I'll extract every decision, commitment, date, and resource allocation, then cross-reference them to find where they intersect — both conflicts and alignments...

📄 Read admissions_meeting_mar12.txt — recruitment targets, program listings, event calendar
📄 Read finance_meeting_mar14.txt — budget adjustments, travel policy, reserve allocation
📄 Read student_services_mar15.txt — orientation redesign, mentoring programs, housing
📄 Read advancement_mar18.txt — donor events, campaign targets, gift restrictions
📄 Read curriculum_committee_mar19.txt — program approvals, assessment framework, online proposals
📄 Read academic_affairs_mar20.txt — advising model, faculty hiring, first-gen initiatives
>_ Bash python3 extract_decisions.py — extracting commitments, dates, dependencies from all 6 transcripts
11:16 AM · 260 tokens
A
AI Assistant Majk Rabbit
🔗
Cross-Reference: 6 Department Meeting Transcripts
3 conflicts · 2 alignments · March 2024
⚠ Conflicts — Decisions That Contradict Each Other
HIGH
Admissions is promising a new online program for fall — Curriculum hasn't approved it
Admissions meeting (Mar 12): "We're including the online MBA in fall recruitment materials." Curriculum committee meeting (Mar 19): "Online MBA proposal is tabled until the assessment framework is finalized — earliest approval is spring." If admissions recruits for a program that doesn't exist yet, enrolled students will need to be redirected.
Impact: 60–80 prospective students recruited for a program that may not launch. Admissions credibility at stake.
HIGH
Finance is cutting travel budgets — Advancement just committed to 4 regional donor events
Finance meeting (Mar 14): "All discretionary travel budgets reduced 30% effective April 1." Advancement meeting (Mar 18): "We've confirmed venues for donor cultivation events in Dallas, Chicago, Atlanta, and Seattle — travel for 6 staff per event." These two decisions will collide in April when Advancement submits travel requests.
Impact: Either the donor events get scaled back (losing $400k+ in projected gifts) or Finance grants an exception that undermines the budget cut.
MED
Student Services is redesigning orientation — Academic Affairs is revising the advising model it depends on
Student Services meeting (Mar 15): "New orientation will route every first-year student to their assigned advisor in week 1." Academic Affairs meeting (Mar 20): "We're restructuring advising from individual faculty to a centralized advising center — transition starts in August." The new orientation is being built on an advising model that won't exist when students arrive.
Impact: Orientation materials and training need to be rebuilt. 3 months of Student Services work may be wasted.
✓ Alignments — Teams Moving in the Same Direction Without Knowing It
STRONG
Three departments independently prioritizing first-generation student support
Admissions is targeting first-gen recruitment. Student Services is building a first-gen mentoring program. Academic Affairs is piloting first-gen-specific advising cohorts. None of these teams referenced each other's work. Combined, they could form a cohesive first-gen strategy — but only if someone connects them.
Opportunity: Convene these three teams. A coordinated first-gen initiative could be a institutional differentiator and a compelling grant application.
MODERATE
Finance and Advancement both flagging the same revenue risk
Finance noted declining state appropriations. Advancement noted that donor giving has shifted toward restricted gifts. Both are describing the same underlying problem — unrestricted revenue is shrinking — from different vantage points. Neither team has connected the two signals into a unified revenue strategy.
Opportunity: Joint Finance-Advancement briefing to the president on unrestricted revenue trends, with a coordinated response plan.
→
The biggest risk: Admissions recruiting for a program that doesn't exist yet
This needs to be resolved this week — recruitment materials are going to print. The Provost needs to either fast-track the online MBA approval or tell Admissions to pull it from fall materials. The other conflicts have longer fuses but the same root cause: departments making decisions in isolation that affect each other.
Y
You

I'm the CEO of a 4-region hospital system. I have Q1 quarterly reports from all 4 regional directors — Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, and West. Each is about 15 pages covering operations, staffing, patient volume, capital projects, and strategic initiatives.

Read across all 4 reports and find: where are regions making conflicting decisions about shared resources? And where are regions independently working on the same problems without coordinating? Build a single-page HTML dashboard to help me understand your analysis.

3:44 PM
A
AI Assistant Majk Rabbit

Reading all four quarterly reports now. I'm looking for shared resource conflicts, duplicated initiatives, and system-wide patterns that look regional in isolation...

📄 Read q1_northeast_report.pdf — 15 pages, operations + staffing + capital projects
📄 Read q1_southeast_report.pdf — 15 pages, operations + staffing + strategic initiatives
📄 Read q1_midwest_report.pdf — 15 pages, operations + patient volume + capital projects
📄 Read q1_west_report.pdf — 15 pages, operations + staffing + pilot programs
>_ Bash python3 cross_reference_reports.py — extracting resource requests, staffing gaps, initiatives across all regions
3:45 PM · 220 tokens
A
AI Assistant Majk Rabbit
🔗
Cross-Reference: 4 Regional Quarterly Reports
Hospital system · Q1 2024 · Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, West regions
⚠ Conflicts
HIGH
Two regions competing for the same traveling specialist pool
Southeast and Midwest both report plans to increase cardiology coverage using the same traveling specialist contract. The system has 8 traveling cardiologists. Southeast is requesting 5 for Q2; Midwest is requesting 4. That's 9 requests for 8 people.
Impact: One region will be short-staffed. Neither region knows the other made the same request.
✓ Alignments
STRONG
All 4 regions report the same staffing pain point — OR nurse shortage
Every regional report mentions difficulty staffing operating room nurses, using different language but describing the same problem. This isn't a regional issue — it's a system-wide crisis that needs a system-wide response (signing bonuses, training pipeline, contract negotiation).
Opportunity: Elevate from regional problem to C-suite priority. A system-wide OR nurse recruitment campaign would be more effective and cheaper than 4 separate regional efforts.
MODERATE
West and Northeast both piloting the same patient intake digitization — neither knows
West region is piloting a tablet-based patient intake at 3 clinics. Northeast started the same pilot at 2 clinics with a different vendor. They're solving the same problem independently, duplicating vendor evaluation, training, and implementation costs.
Opportunity: Connect the two pilots. Share learnings, consolidate vendor negotiations, build a system-wide rollout plan from combined data.
→
The system-wide patterns are invisible at the regional level
Each regional report is well-written and accurate — within its scope. But the most important signals (the shared staffing crisis, the resource collision, the duplicated pilots) only appear when you read across all four. Nobody at any single region could see these patterns. The AI can, because it reads everything.
Y
You

The Admissions-Curriculum conflict is the most urgent. Draft me an email to the VP of Admissions and the Curriculum Committee chair explaining what I found and what needs to happen this week.

11:34 AM
A
AI Assistant Majk Rabbit

Subject: Action needed — Online MBA recruitment materials

Sarah, David —

In reviewing this month's department meeting notes, I found a timing conflict that needs to be resolved before recruitment materials go to print.

Admissions is planning to include the Online MBA in fall recruitment materials (per your March 12 meeting). Curriculum Committee has tabled the Online MBA proposal pending the assessment framework — earliest approval is spring (per your March 19 meeting).

If we recruit for a program that isn't approved, we'll need to redirect enrolled students — which damages our credibility.

Options:
1. Fast-track the Curriculum approval to a special session before recruitment materials go to print (2 weeks)
2. Remove the Online MBA from fall recruitment and plan for a spring launch instead
3. Include it as "coming soon — application opens spring" with no fall enrollment commitment

I'd like your recommendation by Thursday. Happy to convene a 30-minute call if that's faster.

11:35 AM · 290 tokens